Feed of "Gusted" https://codeberg.org/Gusted <p dir="auto">I’m aware (and the NSA is), that I’m pretty <span class="emoji" aria-label="rainbow" data-alias="rainbow">🌈</span>. Bismuth + Iodine</p> <p dir="auto">Forgejo contributor<br/> Codeberg executive board member 2025-2026<br/> Codeberg presidium member 2025-2027</p> <p dir="auto">For more interesting repositories: <a href="https://git.gusted.xyz/Gusted" rel="nofollow">https://git.gusted.xyz/Gusted</a></p>
Fri, 12 Jun 2026 21:09:07 +0200 Gusted approved forgejo/forgejo#13055 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13055#issuecomment-17290001 [v15.0/forgejo] fix: do not try to remove task logs that don't exist (#13040) Gusted 153989999: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13055#issuecomment-17290001
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 19:44:09 +0200 Gusted approved forgejo/forgejo#13044 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13044#issuecomment-17237261 feat(ui): modernize hidden comment types checkboxes in appearance settings Gusted 153511787: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13044#issuecomment-17237261
Thu, 11 Jun 2026 01:33:41 +0200 Gusted approved forgejo/forgejo#13040 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13040#issuecomment-17237168 fix: do not try to remove task logs that don't exist Gusted 153510716: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13040#issuecomment-17237168 Thu, 11 Jun 2026 01:30:33 +0200 Gusted approved forgejo/forgejo#13036 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13036#issuecomment-17219852 correcting referrer policy in HTML `<meta>` tag <p dir="auto">Thanks for catching this!</p> Thanks for catching this! ]]> Gusted 153345887: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/13036#issuecomment-17219852 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:38:26 +0200 Gusted commented on pull request forgejo/forgejo#12845 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12845#issuecomment-17219330 feat: setting to add team members by invitations <p dir="auto">Small thing, otherwise I think it&#39;s good to go!</p> Small thing, otherwise I think it's good to go! ]]> Gusted 153338786: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12845#issuecomment-17219330 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:24:07 +0200 Gusted commented on pull request forgejo/forgejo#12845 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12845#issuecomment-17219114 feat: setting to add team members by invitations <p dir="auto">On the deletion of the user, this should be removed as one of the beans at:</p> On the deletion of the user, this should be removed as one of the beans at: ]]> Gusted 153338423: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12845#issuecomment-17219114 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 19:24:06 +0200 Gusted merged pull request forgejo/forgejo#12996 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12996 fix(tests): restore ability to run with 'go test' Gusted 153224969: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12996 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:58:31 +0200 Gusted pushed to forgejo at forgejo/forgejo https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/906de606aeab483939e98d67053e942d73aaa311 <a href="https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/906de606aeab483939e98d67053e942d73aaa311">906de606aeab483939e98d67053e942d73aaa311</a> chore: restore ability to run with &#39;go test&#39; (#12996) 906de606aeab483939e98d67053e942d73aaa311 chore: restore ability to run with 'go test' (#12996)]]> Gusted 153224741: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/906de606aeab483939e98d67053e942d73aaa311 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:58:28 +0200 Gusted commented on issue Codeberg/Community#2732 https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2732#issuecomment-17203196 Force-push and new commit on repo did not update pull request <p dir="auto">Hi, could you push yet another empty commit? We can&#39;t re-trigger a event like that from our side. If the pull request is then still not updated we can do some extra investigation.</p> Hi, could you push yet another empty commit? We can't re-trigger a event like that from our side. If the pull request is then still not updated we can do some extra investigation. ]]> Gusted 153219554: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2732#issuecomment-17203196 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:47:57 +0200 Gusted deleted branch renovate/forgejo-lock-file-maintenance from forgejo/forgejo https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo Gusted 153213824: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:40:16 +0200 Gusted merged pull request forgejo/forgejo#12992 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12992 Lock file maintenance (forgejo) Gusted 153213407: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12992 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:39:59 +0200 Gusted pushed to forgejo at forgejo/forgejo https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/3b9e90313d6938e69a0e3c4ac698d8330c65f82d <a href="https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/3b9e90313d6938e69a0e3c4ac698d8330c65f82d">3b9e90313d6938e69a0e3c4ac698d8330c65f82d</a> Lock file maintenance (forgejo) (#12992) 3b9e90313d6938e69a0e3c4ac698d8330c65f82d Lock file maintenance (forgejo) (#12992)]]> Gusted 153213041: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/commit/3b9e90313d6938e69a0e3c4ac698d8330c65f82d Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:39:55 +0200 Gusted approved forgejo/forgejo#12992 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12992#issuecomment-17202782 Lock file maintenance (forgejo) Gusted 153211829: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12992#issuecomment-17202782 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:38:14 +0200 Gusted commented on pull request forgejo/website#936 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/936#issuecomment-17201435 chore(renovate): rebase only when conflicted <p dir="auto">Feels we could do more project wide? Also would like to see this for forgejo/forgejo.</p> Feels we could do more project wide? Also would like to see this for forgejo/forgejo. ]]> Gusted 153197051: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/936#issuecomment-17201435 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:08:06 +0200 Gusted commented on issue Codeberg/Community#2730 https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2730#issuecomment-17201372 HEAD.lock present & repo taking unnecessary space <p dir="auto">That&#39;s not related to the lock issue. Simply push a new commit to it and it should be all good.</p> That's not related to the lock issue. Simply push a new commit to it and it should be all good. ]]> Gusted 153195980: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2730#issuecomment-17201372 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:06:33 +0200 Gusted approved forgejo/website#939 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/939#issuecomment-17201243 chore(ci): fix link checker website build missing pnpm install Gusted 153194684: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/website/pulls/939#issuecomment-17201243 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 15:04:37 +0200 Gusted commented on issue Codeberg/Community#2730 https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2730#issuecomment-17200955 HEAD.lock present & repo taking unnecessary space <p dir="auto">On which repository is the lock issue? For project_templates I don&#39;t see any.</p> On which repository is the lock issue? For project_templates I don't see any. ]]> Gusted 153190880: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg/Community/issues/2730#issuecomment-17200955 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:57:01 +0200 Gusted deleted branch bp-v15.0-630f08e from forgejo/docs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs Gusted 153178613: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:37:26 +0200 Gusted pushed to v15.0 at forgejo/docs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/commit/7d23492f06d30147ce9467222b9616d66ab988f6 <a href="https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/commit/7d23492f06d30147ce9467222b9616d66ab988f6">7d23492f06d30147ce9467222b9616d66ab988f6</a> [v15.0] Improve database preparation page (#2010) 7d23492f06d30147ce9467222b9616d66ab988f6 [v15.0] Improve database preparation page (#2010)]]> Gusted 153178457: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/commit/7d23492f06d30147ce9467222b9616d66ab988f6 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:37:26 +0200 Gusted merged pull request forgejo/docs#2010 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/2010 [v15.0] Improve database preparation page Gusted 153178436: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/2010 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:37:26 +0200 Gusted approved forgejo/docs#2010 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/2010#issuecomment-17199665 [v15.0] Improve database preparation page Gusted 153174212: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/2010#issuecomment-17199665 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:27:46 +0200 Gusted merged pull request forgejo/docs#2009 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/2009 Improve database preparation page Gusted 153169487: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/pulls/2009 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:18:23 +0200 Gusted pushed to next at forgejo/docs https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/commit/630f08e7da7d8f71bb7227f5bdf05942fd05da43 <a href="https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/commit/630f08e7da7d8f71bb7227f5bdf05942fd05da43">630f08e7da7d8f71bb7227f5bdf05942fd05da43</a> Improve database preparation page (#2009) 630f08e7da7d8f71bb7227f5bdf05942fd05da43 Improve database preparation page (#2009)]]> Gusted 153169481: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/docs/commit/630f08e7da7d8f71bb7227f5bdf05942fd05da43 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:18:22 +0200 Gusted commented on issue forgejo/forgejo#12570 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/12570#issuecomment-17199146 enh: expiring team invitations <p dir="auto">That would be the most straight forward option, although I wonder about a use case where someone really requires a tighter or more flexible expiration. But I suppose adding a database field later (which defaults to the global value), would still be possible?</p> That would be the most straight forward option, although I wonder about a use case where someone really requires a tighter or more flexible expiration. But I suppose adding a database field later (which defaults to the global value), would still be possible? ]]> Gusted 153169040: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/12570#issuecomment-17199146 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 14:18:13 +0200 Gusted commented on pull request Codeberg-Infrastr.../scripted-configuration#103 https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/scripted-configuration/pulls/103#issuecomment-17197985 Update Anubis config with new session cookie name <p dir="auto">We no longer show Anubis for a page where a (valid) session should be expected, so the rule should probably just outright be removed.</p> We no longer show Anubis for a page where a (valid) session should be expected, so the rule should probably just outright be removed. ]]> Gusted 153153044: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/scripted-configuration/pulls/103#issuecomment-17197985 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:52:25 +0200 Gusted pushed to codeberg-15 at Codeberg-Infrastr.../forgejo https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo/compare/6ac8e69a489c8463ea53cac934151e89267d5092...1fa1b083c1f696b71af424f5475a0a7978143b62 <a href="https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo/commit/1fa1b083c1f696b71af424f5475a0a7978143b62">1fa1b083c1f696b71af424f5475a0a7978143b62</a> Merge remote-tracking branch &#39;forgejo/v15.0/forgejo&#39; into codeberg-15 <a href="https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo/commit/f6d4219f10a29dd6d59dfb5d8e44b7ff7aed4274">f6d4219f10a29dd6d59dfb5d8e44b7ff7aed4274</a> [v15.0/forgejo]: 2026-06-10 security patches (#13002) <a href="https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo/commit/f6b0940354b9226c65892c8f76bf3e6428a45554">f6b0940354b9226c65892c8f76bf3e6428a45554</a> Update playwright monorepo to v1.60.0 (v15.0/forgejo) (#13021) <a href="https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo/commit/cbe160c7f6e58e690dad3e6e6cdb36d68efd60d2">cbe160c7f6e58e690dad3e6e6cdb36d68efd60d2</a> [v15.0/forgejo] Update module ini to v1.67.3 to improve config parse performance (#13000) <a href="https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo/commit/590b6b9373039fa9a15cd7848ec61bd66811eba4">590b6b9373039fa9a15cd7848ec61bd66811eba4</a> [v15.0/forgejo] fix(doctor): ensure the doctor runs with the same settings.AppPath as Forgejo (#12974) 1fa1b083c1f696b71af424f5475a0a7978143b62 Merge remote-tracking branch 'forgejo/v15.0/forgejo' into codeberg-15 f6d4219f10a29dd6d59dfb5d8e44b7ff7aed4274 [v15.0/forgejo]: 2026-06-10 security patches (#13002) f6b0940354b9226c65892c8f76bf3e6428a45554 Update playwright monorepo to v1.60.0 (v15.0/forgejo) (#13021) cbe160c7f6e58e690dad3e6e6cdb36d68efd60d2 [v15.0/forgejo] Update module ini to v1.67.3 to improve config parse performance (#13000) 590b6b9373039fa9a15cd7848ec61bd66811eba4 [v15.0/forgejo] fix(doctor): ensure the doctor runs with the same settings.AppPath as Forgejo (#12974)]]> Gusted 153151409: https://codeberg.org/Codeberg-Infrastructure/forgejo/compare/6ac8e69a489c8463ea53cac934151e89267d5092...1fa1b083c1f696b71af424f5475a0a7978143b62 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:49:36 +0200 Gusted commented on issue forgejo/forgejo#5178 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/5178#issuecomment-17197778 feat: indicate commit order in PR view <p dir="auto">Is the commit order indicated if the commits are made on the same day? I suppose it&#39;s really easy to figure out the order once there are commits from two separate days, as you can see how it&#39;s stacked chronologically.</p> Is the commit order indicated if the commits are made on the same day? I suppose it's really easy to figure out the order once there are commits from two separate days, as you can see how it's stacked chronologically. ]]> Gusted 153150260: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/5178#issuecomment-17197778 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:47:12 +0200 Gusted commented on issue forgejo/forgejo#12862 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/12862#issuecomment-17197667 problem(pr): "viewed files" not working in single commit view <p dir="auto">I believe the backend can store this information and have this feature on a per-commit basis. It simply has to store the &#34;viewed&#34; info for the commit it&#39;s reviewing on and not the whole commit. Although it might be easier to hide the feature for now until it&#39;s fixed.</p> I believe the backend can store this information and have this feature on a per-commit basis. It simply has to store the "viewed" info for the commit it's reviewing on and not the whole commit. Although it might be easier to hide the feature for now until it's fixed. ]]> Gusted 153148727: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/issues/12862#issuecomment-17197667 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:45:29 +0200 Gusted suggested changes for forgejo/forgejo#12891 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12891#issuecomment-17197577 WIP: fix: public starred (and normal) repository count includes private repositories both with API and UI <p dir="auto">I&#39;m afraid a different approach needs to be chosen here.</p> I'm afraid a different approach needs to be chosen here. ]]> Gusted 153145964: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12891#issuecomment-17197577 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:42:22 +0200 Gusted commented on pull request forgejo/forgejo#12891 https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12891#issuecomment-17197571 WIP: fix: public starred (and normal) repository count includes private repositories both with API and UI <p dir="auto">This is redundant information with a JOIN this can be queried from the repository table directly. And just if the repository private or not is not the only access control that needs to be checked for.</p> <p dir="auto">I&#39;m afraid this has to be calculated on-demand and that <code>NumStars</code> need to be removed from the User profile, as it changes based on who is asking.</p> This is redundant information with a JOIN this can be queried from the repository table directly. And just if the repository private or not is not the only access control that needs to be checked for.

I'm afraid this has to be calculated on-demand and that NumStars need to be removed from the User profile, as it changes based on who is asking.

]]> Gusted 153145547: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/12891#issuecomment-17197571 Wed, 10 Jun 2026 13:42:20 +0200