Update foldcolumn overflow logic#20280
Open
matystroia wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Member
|
Thanks but I am a bit unsure. Like to hear from others first. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See neovim/neovim#39916 and my comment (neovim/neovim#39916 (comment)). This PR implements the 2nd solution.
Current
foldcolumnbehavior whenfdc=3:Proposed behavior:
And with
fdc=4:On lines where we can't draw all the fold levels, this would turn the first column into a spill indicator. Thus
2|would mean there are two fold levels that are "collapsed".IMO this is a better use of the limited space than always displaying
[n-1][n], and is a bit clearer visually.