Skip to content

Fix issues in IE9 compatible browser #4624#4625

Open
gnh1201 wants to merge 6 commits into
summernote:mainfrom
gnh1201:develop
Open

Fix issues in IE9 compatible browser #4624#4625
gnh1201 wants to merge 6 commits into
summernote:mainfrom
gnh1201:develop

Conversation

@gnh1201

@gnh1201 gnh1201 commented Mar 20, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What does this PR do?

Where should the reviewer start?

  • src/js/core/env.js
    • When rendering the summernote editor in IE9 (IE9 compatible browser), $popover (or this.$popover) should not be null. (Based on summernote commit 1521019.)
    • The issue arose due to the lack of a join method in the CanvasPixelArray prototype, so I have added a check for this prototype.
  • src/js/module/Editor.js
    • When applying styles such as bold, underline, and italic in IE9 (IE9 compatible browser) there should be no errors. (Based on summernote version 0.8.18)

How should this be manually tested?

Any background context you want to provide?

  • This is a patch related to a browser that is compatible with IE9 specifications, not meant for general users but for industrial purposes. Unlike IE9 for general users, this browser is still in use for industrial applications, hence it's worth applying the patch.

What are the relevant tickets?

Screenshot (if for frontend)

image

Checklist

  • Added relevant tests or not required
  • Didn't break anything

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling in the editor's command execution to prevent interruptions.
  • Improvements

    • Enhanced font installation check by refining pixel data processing for better accuracy.
  • Chores

    • Updated Webpack configuration for a more structured production build process without introducing new functionality.

@DennisSuitters

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Excellent, thank you for creating a PR, once I get a moment, I'll test the changes, and if all good do the merge.

@hackerwins hackerwins changed the base branch from develop to main September 21, 2024 02:57
@hackerwins hackerwins force-pushed the main branch 7 times, most recently from 00ca049 to 9dedcd8 Compare September 28, 2024 13:27
@hackerwins hackerwins added the bug 🐞 Something isn't working label Oct 1, 2024
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Oct 1, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Walkthrough

The changes across multiple files focus on refining the Webpack production configuration, enhancing pixel data processing in the font installation check, and adding error handling in the editor's command execution. The Webpack configuration now includes a commented-out section for ES5 compatibility, while the pixel data handling has been updated to improve string conversion. Additionally, the editor has been fortified with a try-catch block to manage potential errors during command execution.

Changes

File Change Summary
config/webpack.production.js Added a commented-out section for ES5 compatibility, reiterated entry points, and retained existing configurations without introducing new functionality.
src/js/core/env.js Modified the getPxInfo function to improve how pixel data is processed and returned as a string.
src/js/module/Editor.js Introduced a try-catch block around a command execution to handle potential errors gracefully.

Possibly related PRs

  • Fix unintended <br> insertion during bullet indentation #4684: The changes in src/js/core/dom.js regarding the control of <br> element insertion are directly related to the main PR's focus on modifying the Webpack configuration, as both involve adjustments to the handling of elements in the editor's functionality.

Poem

In the land of code where rabbits play,
Changes hop in a splendid array.
Webpack's tune now sings of ease,
Fonts check pixels with newfound breeze.
Commands now dance, error-free,
Hooray for updates, let’s all agree! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/js/module/Editor.js (2)

680-684: Improved error handling for styleWithCSS command.

The addition of a try-catch block around the document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', ...) call is a good practice. It prevents potential errors from breaking the editor's functionality, especially in browsers that might not support this command.

However, there are a few points to consider:

  1. The catch block is currently empty, which silently ignores any errors.
  2. The eslint-disable-next-line comment suggests that there might be a linting rule violation.

Consider logging the error or handling it more explicitly. Here's a suggested improvement:

 try {
   document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', false, this.options.styleWithCSS);
 } catch(e) {
-  // eslint-disable-next-line
+  console.warn('styleWithCSS command not supported:', e);
 }

This change will provide more information for debugging while still preventing the error from breaking the editor's functionality.


677-687: Consider adding a comment explaining the IE9 compatibility purpose.

The addition of the try-catch block is a good step towards improving IE9 compatibility, as mentioned in the PR objectives. However, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining this purpose for future maintainers.

Consider adding a comment like this:

 beforeCommand() {
   this.context.triggerEvent('before.command', this.$editable.html());

   // Set styleWithCSS before run a command
+  // This try-catch block is added for IE9 compatibility
   try {
     document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', false, this.options.styleWithCSS);
   } catch(e) {
     console.warn('styleWithCSS command not supported:', e);
   }

   // keep focus on editable before command execution
   this.focus();
 }

This comment will help future developers understand the reason for this specific error handling.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0900610 and 666561e.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • config/webpack.production.js (1 hunks)
  • src/js/core/env.js (1 hunks)
  • src/js/module/Editor.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/js/core/env.js (1)

30-41: Approve changes with minor suggestions for improvement

The modifications successfully address the IE9 compatibility issue by checking for the existence of CanvasPixelArray.prototype.join. This change maintains functionality across different browsers while solving the specific problem mentioned in the PR objectives.

However, I have a few suggestions to improve code quality and readability:

  1. Consider using a more descriptive name for the variable s, such as pixelDataString.
  2. Adjust the indentation of the new code to match the rest of the function.
  3. Move the comment "Get pixel information" to before line 30 to accurately reflect its purpose.

Here's a suggested refactor incorporating these changes:

 function getPxInfo(font) {
-    let s = '';
+    // Get pixel information
+    let pixelDataString = '';
     context.clearRect(0, 0, canvasWidth, canvasHeight);
     context.font = fontSize + ' ' + validFontName(font) + ', "' + testFontName + '"';
     context.fillText(testText, canvasWidth / 2, canvasHeight / 2);
-    // Get pixel information
     var pxInfo = context.getImageData(0, 0, canvasWidth, canvasHeight).data;
-    if (CanvasPixelArray.prototype.join) {
-      s = pxInfo.join();
-    } else {
-      for (let i = 0; i < pxInfo.length; i++) s += pxInfo[i].toString();
-    }
-    return s;
+    if (CanvasPixelArray.prototype.join) {
+        pixelDataString = pxInfo.join();
+    } else {
+        for (let i = 0; i < pxInfo.length; i++) pixelDataString += pxInfo[i].toString();
+    }
+    return pixelDataString;
 }

To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact other browsers, please run the following verification script:

config/webpack.production.js (2)

Line range hint 1-214: LGTM - Webpack configuration remains solid with potential for IE9 support

The changes to this file are minimal and don't introduce any immediate issues. The commented-out environment configuration provides a clear path for enabling IE9 support if needed in the future.

The overall webpack configuration remains well-structured for a production build, including:

  • Appropriate entry points for styles and languages
  • Correct externals configuration for jQuery
  • Comprehensive module rules for processing JavaScript and CSS
  • Proper optimization settings for minimizing JavaScript and CSS
  • Essential plugins for cleaning, copying, and zipping the build output

These configurations align well with the project's needs and the PR's objectives.


64-67: Consider enabling ES5 compatibility settings for IE9 support

The commented-out environment configuration in the output section is relevant to the PR's objective of fixing issues in IE9 compatible browsers. However, it's currently inactive.

  1. If IE9 support is a priority, consider uncommenting and enabling these settings.
  2. If you choose to keep it commented out, please add a comment explaining why it's not enabled and under what circumstances it should be used.

Example documentation:

// Uncomment the following section to enable ES5 compatibility for IE9 support
// environment: {
//   const: false,
//   arrowFunction: false,
// },

This will help future maintainers understand the purpose and potential use of this configuration.

To ensure this change doesn't conflict with other parts of the codebase, please run the following command:

src/js/module/Editor.js (1)

680-684: Summary: Improved IE9 compatibility with minimal risk.

This change introduces better error handling for the 'styleWithCSS' command, which is likely to improve IE9 compatibility as intended. The try-catch block is a safe addition that shouldn't negatively impact other browsers.

Key points:

  1. The change addresses the PR objective of fixing issues in IE9 compatible browsers.
  2. It introduces minimal risk to existing functionality.
  3. Proper testing in IE9 and other browsers is crucial to ensure the change's effectiveness.

Good job on improving the editor's browser compatibility!

Comment thread src/js/module/Editor.js
Comment on lines 677 to 687
this.context.triggerEvent('before.command', this.$editable.html());

// Set styleWithCSS before run a command
document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', false, this.options.styleWithCSS);
try {
document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', false, this.options.styleWithCSS);
} catch(e) {
// eslint-disable-next-line
}

// keep focus on editable before command execution
this.focus();

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

Add browser compatibility tests for Editor

No existing tests found for IE9 or general browser compatibility. To ensure that the editor functions correctly across all supported browsers, please add appropriate tests for IE9 and other browsers.

🔗 Analysis chain

Verify editor functionality in IE9 and other browsers.

While this change improves IE9 compatibility, it's crucial to ensure it doesn't negatively impact the editor's functionality in other browsers.

Please run the following tests:

  1. Verify that the editor functions correctly in IE9 after this change.
  2. Ensure that the editor's functionality remains unchanged in other supported browsers.

If these tests don't exist, consider adding them to ensure ongoing compatibility.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for browser compatibility tests
rg -i "test.*browser.*compatibility" test/
# Search for IE9 specific tests
rg -i "test.*ie9" test/

Length of output: 70


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search for any tests related to browsers or compatibility
rg -i "browser|compatibility|ie9" test/ --files-with-matches

# Search for test files that might include 'editor' related tests
rg -i "editor.*test" test/ --files-with-matches

# List all JavaScript test files for manual review
fd -t f -e test.js test/ | xargs ls

Length of output: 631


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for IE9 and browser compatibility tests within Editor.spec.js
rg -i "ie9|browser compatibility|compatibility" test/base/module/Editor.spec.js

Length of output: 81

@hackerwins hackerwins force-pushed the main branch 2 times, most recently from d29c07c to 765bfb7 Compare October 20, 2024 11:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bug 🐞 Something isn't working

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants