Fix issues in IE9 compatible browser #4624#4625
Conversation
|
Excellent, thank you for creating a PR, once I get a moment, I'll test the changes, and if all good do the merge. |
00ca049 to
9dedcd8
Compare
WalkthroughThe changes across multiple files focus on refining the Webpack production configuration, enhancing pixel data processing in the font installation check, and adding error handling in the editor's command execution. The Webpack configuration now includes a commented-out section for ES5 compatibility, while the pixel data handling has been updated to improve string conversion. Additionally, the editor has been fortified with a try-catch block to manage potential errors during command execution. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/js/module/Editor.js (2)
680-684: Improved error handling for styleWithCSS command.The addition of a try-catch block around the
document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', ...)call is a good practice. It prevents potential errors from breaking the editor's functionality, especially in browsers that might not support this command.However, there are a few points to consider:
- The catch block is currently empty, which silently ignores any errors.
- The eslint-disable-next-line comment suggests that there might be a linting rule violation.
Consider logging the error or handling it more explicitly. Here's a suggested improvement:
try { document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', false, this.options.styleWithCSS); } catch(e) { - // eslint-disable-next-line + console.warn('styleWithCSS command not supported:', e); }This change will provide more information for debugging while still preventing the error from breaking the editor's functionality.
677-687: Consider adding a comment explaining the IE9 compatibility purpose.The addition of the try-catch block is a good step towards improving IE9 compatibility, as mentioned in the PR objectives. However, it would be beneficial to add a comment explaining this purpose for future maintainers.
Consider adding a comment like this:
beforeCommand() { this.context.triggerEvent('before.command', this.$editable.html()); // Set styleWithCSS before run a command + // This try-catch block is added for IE9 compatibility try { document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', false, this.options.styleWithCSS); } catch(e) { console.warn('styleWithCSS command not supported:', e); } // keep focus on editable before command execution this.focus(); }This comment will help future developers understand the reason for this specific error handling.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- config/webpack.production.js (1 hunks)
- src/js/core/env.js (1 hunks)
- src/js/module/Editor.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/js/core/env.js (1)
30-41: Approve changes with minor suggestions for improvementThe modifications successfully address the IE9 compatibility issue by checking for the existence of
CanvasPixelArray.prototype.join. This change maintains functionality across different browsers while solving the specific problem mentioned in the PR objectives.However, I have a few suggestions to improve code quality and readability:
- Consider using a more descriptive name for the variable
s, such aspixelDataString.- Adjust the indentation of the new code to match the rest of the function.
- Move the comment "Get pixel information" to before line 30 to accurately reflect its purpose.
Here's a suggested refactor incorporating these changes:
function getPxInfo(font) { - let s = ''; + // Get pixel information + let pixelDataString = ''; context.clearRect(0, 0, canvasWidth, canvasHeight); context.font = fontSize + ' ' + validFontName(font) + ', "' + testFontName + '"'; context.fillText(testText, canvasWidth / 2, canvasHeight / 2); - // Get pixel information var pxInfo = context.getImageData(0, 0, canvasWidth, canvasHeight).data; - if (CanvasPixelArray.prototype.join) { - s = pxInfo.join(); - } else { - for (let i = 0; i < pxInfo.length; i++) s += pxInfo[i].toString(); - } - return s; + if (CanvasPixelArray.prototype.join) { + pixelDataString = pxInfo.join(); + } else { + for (let i = 0; i < pxInfo.length; i++) pixelDataString += pxInfo[i].toString(); + } + return pixelDataString; }To ensure this change doesn't negatively impact other browsers, please run the following verification script:
config/webpack.production.js (2)
Line range hint
1-214: LGTM - Webpack configuration remains solid with potential for IE9 supportThe changes to this file are minimal and don't introduce any immediate issues. The commented-out
environmentconfiguration provides a clear path for enabling IE9 support if needed in the future.The overall webpack configuration remains well-structured for a production build, including:
- Appropriate entry points for styles and languages
- Correct externals configuration for jQuery
- Comprehensive module rules for processing JavaScript and CSS
- Proper optimization settings for minimizing JavaScript and CSS
- Essential plugins for cleaning, copying, and zipping the build output
These configurations align well with the project's needs and the PR's objectives.
64-67: Consider enabling ES5 compatibility settings for IE9 supportThe commented-out
environmentconfiguration in theoutputsection is relevant to the PR's objective of fixing issues in IE9 compatible browsers. However, it's currently inactive.
- If IE9 support is a priority, consider uncommenting and enabling these settings.
- If you choose to keep it commented out, please add a comment explaining why it's not enabled and under what circumstances it should be used.
Example documentation:
// Uncomment the following section to enable ES5 compatibility for IE9 support // environment: { // const: false, // arrowFunction: false, // },This will help future maintainers understand the purpose and potential use of this configuration.
To ensure this change doesn't conflict with other parts of the codebase, please run the following command:
src/js/module/Editor.js (1)
680-684: Summary: Improved IE9 compatibility with minimal risk.This change introduces better error handling for the 'styleWithCSS' command, which is likely to improve IE9 compatibility as intended. The try-catch block is a safe addition that shouldn't negatively impact other browsers.
Key points:
- The change addresses the PR objective of fixing issues in IE9 compatible browsers.
- It introduces minimal risk to existing functionality.
- Proper testing in IE9 and other browsers is crucial to ensure the change's effectiveness.
Good job on improving the editor's browser compatibility!
| this.context.triggerEvent('before.command', this.$editable.html()); | ||
|
|
||
| // Set styleWithCSS before run a command | ||
| document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', false, this.options.styleWithCSS); | ||
| try { | ||
| document.execCommand('styleWithCSS', false, this.options.styleWithCSS); | ||
| } catch(e) { | ||
| // eslint-disable-next-line | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // keep focus on editable before command execution | ||
| this.focus(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Add browser compatibility tests for Editor
No existing tests found for IE9 or general browser compatibility. To ensure that the editor functions correctly across all supported browsers, please add appropriate tests for IE9 and other browsers.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify editor functionality in IE9 and other browsers.
While this change improves IE9 compatibility, it's crucial to ensure it doesn't negatively impact the editor's functionality in other browsers.
Please run the following tests:
- Verify that the editor functions correctly in IE9 after this change.
- Ensure that the editor's functionality remains unchanged in other supported browsers.
If these tests don't exist, consider adding them to ensure ongoing compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for browser compatibility tests
rg -i "test.*browser.*compatibility" test/
# Search for IE9 specific tests
rg -i "test.*ie9" test/
Length of output: 70
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Broaden the search for any tests related to browsers or compatibility
rg -i "browser|compatibility|ie9" test/ --files-with-matches
# Search for test files that might include 'editor' related tests
rg -i "editor.*test" test/ --files-with-matches
# List all JavaScript test files for manual review
fd -t f -e test.js test/ | xargs ls
Length of output: 631
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for IE9 and browser compatibility tests within Editor.spec.js
rg -i "ie9|browser compatibility|compatibility" test/base/module/Editor.spec.js
Length of output: 81
d29c07c to
765bfb7
Compare
What does this PR do?
Where should the reviewer start?
How should this be manually tested?
Any background context you want to provide?
What are the relevant tickets?
Screenshot (if for frontend)
Checklist
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Improvements
Chores